To Kill a Mockingbird Review (Blog #8)

The part I enjoyed of To Kill a Mockingbird was the acting and the visuals. Jim, played by Kevin Davis portrayed the character as was in the book. His acting was very realistic, he was emotional was when he needed to be, he acted innocent when he was in court. I enjoyed watching grown up Scout become the narrator, I thought that fit into the story perfectly. I thought their clothes fit the time period perfectly. Danielle Milano did a very good job in portraying Scout as a very innocent childish tomboy.

Her overalls and short hair portray the time period and her being a tomboy.

Young Scout was played by Milano well with a very strong and convincing country accent, but despite this she seemed to have a quiet voice naturally and was often overpowered by the music. Jem, played by Jordan Abronson was also a very suitable actor for his character. He displayed through his acting exactly what the audience was looking for, a curious young boy who had no idea what was going on in the trials, but at the same time was very eager and insisting on learning more about his father's trials. 

Jem, sitting in a crowd of black folks in the trial. His eyes seem to be filled with wonder and curiosity about what could be going on during the trials and what it might be about.

Atticus Finch's character was played by Galleron, and he was a very suitable person for the role. His calm and very subtle attitude portrayed Atticus as if he were straight from the book itself. Galleron also depicted Atticus's change of personalities when necessary. During the speech he became very serious and aggressive with his words to make sure that he was heard and his message went to everyone's head. 

Atticus Finch's character is a difficult character to act. One must be able to imitate his actions and personalities, happiness with his children and aggressiveness in the court.

Wild Duck: Me as a Director (Blog #9)

In act 1, it would seem as the study which Pettersen and Jensen are cleaning and tidying up is a huge dark room, lit by a couple candles in parts of the room but mainly lit by the fire place, which would have two huge arm chairs facing it. Since Pettersen and Jensen are of servant status, they would be dressed not in the finest clothes but more rags and clothing of less value. I would also have Pettersen and Jensen's skin color to be significantly darker than those that they are serving, showing their status as servants. In the scene where all the guests are done with dinner and are going to the music room to have coffee, I would have all the guests come out in groups of 3 or 4 to show the differences among the guests, such as the flabby gentlemen and the thin haired gentlemen. All the guests would be wearing fine clothing, dark suits and tall hats to complete their high class image.

This would be something like the room in where Hialmar and Greger caught up with each other after a long period of time without talking.

Clothing of the guests, such as Werle, who hosted the party.

In the scene where Hialmar and Greger have their conversation, I would have the room completely emptied of all the characters except them. In this setting, I would have the room to be very dark with only the fire place as a source of light, to increase the intensity of their conversation. Since Greger seems very surprised by all of Hialmar's news I would have Greger move around a lot in his chair with different expressions on his face to show his "enlightenment" of Hialmar's life. The chairs that they would be sitting on would be huge, and look very comfortable to bring out a sense of Werle's wealth.

A list of facial expressions to show all the emotions Hialmar and Greger may have expressed towards each other during the play.

Hialmar and Greger would be resting on chairs like these to reminisce about old times and catch up with on another.

After their conversation, when all the guests return to the study, I would have the room re-lit with other light sources such as candles and lanterns. While the conversation and joking is going on between the guests and Mrs. Sorby, I would have Hialmar sit in his seat very awkwardly and quietly, maybe even a couple sweat drops coming down his forehead, to show that something is bothering him. At this point, I would also have some of the guests be drunk and loud, to show that they have been having doing their own thing, not concerning Hialmar or Greger. When Hialmar does not acknowledge his father, I would have the atmosphere in the entire room to be very awkward.

Response to Loose Knit (Blog #10)

Bob was actually portrayed as an Asian in the San Jose production.

My favorite moment in Loose Knit, was when Bob was introduced for the first time in the play. As soon as he entered the stage, his first line was, "Excuse me ladies, penis coming through!". I thought this to be extremely hilarious and it helped me enjoy the rest of the play. Another part of the play I enjoyed very much was every time Miles said "I'm sorry, did I pull a nerve?". I thought that this was funny because he said that exact line to each of Liz's friends: Gina, Paula, and Margie, whom she had set up dinner dates with.

Bob and Liz (not the San Jose State production). I enjoyed Bob's character, he was a man of lust and to live in the moment. He often talked about how boring life was once you settle down.

I wasn't pleased too much about Theresa Rebeck's representation of sexual and marriage. I thought that it would have been more appropriate if Bob had an affair with Gina, Paula, or Margie, if not all of them. But in a way that type of scandal is what made Rebeck's play stand out. I was shocked and a little bit disgusted that Lily knew that her own sister was having an affair with her husband, yet she had no immediate action. I thought it was very strange that she would interrupt any thing that would lead to the conversation about Liz and Bob's affair. I also did not like Gina's role in the play. I thought that she should have been the perfect one of the knitting club, to become a role model so that the play would have a positive character to find direction and wisdom. Instead she was losing her mind, knitting 24/7 all day, everyday. 

The layers of knitting material represent all the knitting that Gina did because she wasn't keeping track of her life after she lost her job. She kept knitting and knitting and making huge amounts of clothing which she later started a business with the help from Margie.

I enjoyed the entire play, but the scene that I liked the least was when Mile's found out that Liz had planned to stand him up on the second date. I thought that he wasn't that bad of a guy and deserved to be with her because had won her and she seemed interest in him also (or at least his possessions). I also didn't like how Rebeck portrayed Miles almost like a "bad guy" and made him seem really mean to each of Liz's friends and sister. I believed he was just a different character with a different personality, though he was a bit strange which everyone would agree.

Differences of English vs French & Italian Theater (Blog #5)

In Catholic theater, many objects and props symbolize parts of their religion.

Theater and play writing was perceived and viewed in different ways between Catholics and Protestants. Between the Protestants, there was dispute; some Protestant followers believed that theater was a form of idolatry and forbidden worship. On the other side, Catholics favored theater and believed that it represented the cosmic divinity of their faith. In England, theater was appreciated and used by Queen Elizabeth in the educational system for young children, and also as a means for relations with political parties. Theater was also very business-like and included attractions including food vendors, prostitution, and others. Catholics used theater to their advantage and increased their number of followers. Their drama's were about very commercial things, staying away from the classic mythology related dramas.

English theater was a huge business, and play writing became a very competitive job. Because of the level of competition, themes moved from classical mythology to themes that would attract a bigger audience including: contemporary, hybrid, unstable narrative and more. The French and Italians played the opposite, often their dramas were filled with morals for the audience to learn from. This type of theater had many strict rules, one of them being that the plays must all be divided into 5 different acts. Another huge rule was that there would be no singing or dancing.


Another one of the big differences between English and, French and Italian theater is that the English had very poor quality theaters, being made from wood while the French and Italians had very grand, magnificent theaters. But while the French and Italians had the higher quality structures, they had trouble with the inner part of the theater, unsure of what stories to put on for play.